<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plateau Stone Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/archives/559/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/archives/559</link>
	<description>The Kingdom from another angle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jg</title>
		<link>http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/archives/559/comment-page-1#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/?p=559#comment-867</guid>
		<description>This is something that I am trying to get up to speed on. The stone wall is actually a double wall with a space in between the walls that is filled with a natural mud-and-small-stone slurry, which I believe allows for more ‘elastic’ behavior than would a cement-based mix. The wooden post-and-beam interior that is characteristic of this style - though which was not used in these small buildings -is independent of the walls, the load of the roof carried by the interior wood construction. Though I have no statistics - and I doubt that there are any available – I suspect that the Tibetans have adapted to living in a quite active earthquake zone. The question I would like to see answered is how many Tibetan buildings built in this fashion came down during the May 12, 2008 earthquake in Sichuan province; much of the effected area was in the Tibetan cultural region. But that is probably a question that will not be asked, and if, by chance it were, I would guess that it would not be answered.

If you notice in the top two photos above there is a glass porch that runs along the south wall of all three buildings, a passive solar retrofit after the buildings were erected. The local education bureau contracted this job, and the work went to a non-Tibetan official’s relative. The work is poor, and in the top right photo (click for a larger  copy) you can see a crack that runs from the top of the window across the corner. All the slabs that were poured between the original building and the raised footer are also cracked and the footers are in the process of sinking. In the summer of 2006 there was a flood at this school and the foundations were covered in water, though I am not sure for how long. As you can see, the plumb corners on the stone buildings attest to the integrity of the construction. The quick-money-to-buddy work is what was most negatively impacted. No surprise, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something that I am trying to get up to speed on. The stone wall is actually a double wall with a space in between the walls that is filled with a natural mud-and-small-stone slurry, which I believe allows for more ‘elastic’ behavior than would a cement-based mix. The wooden post-and-beam interior that is characteristic of this style &#8211; though which was not used in these small buildings -is independent of the walls, the load of the roof carried by the interior wood construction. Though I have no statistics &#8211; and I doubt that there are any available – I suspect that the Tibetans have adapted to living in a quite active earthquake zone. The question I would like to see answered is how many Tibetan buildings built in this fashion came down during the May 12, 2008 earthquake in Sichuan province; much of the effected area was in the Tibetan cultural region. But that is probably a question that will not be asked, and if, by chance it were, I would guess that it would not be answered.</p>
<p>If you notice in the top two photos above there is a glass porch that runs along the south wall of all three buildings, a passive solar retrofit after the buildings were erected. The local education bureau contracted this job, and the work went to a non-Tibetan official’s relative. The work is poor, and in the top right photo (click for a larger  copy) you can see a crack that runs from the top of the window across the corner. All the slabs that were poured between the original building and the raised footer are also cracked and the footers are in the process of sinking. In the summer of 2006 there was a flood at this school and the foundations were covered in water, though I am not sure for how long. As you can see, the plumb corners on the stone buildings attest to the integrity of the construction. The quick-money-to-buddy work is what was most negatively impacted. No surprise, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhb</title>
		<link>http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/archives/559/comment-page-1#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>bhb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudenoon.com/absalletc/?p=559#comment-864</guid>
		<description>How well does this architecture stand up to earthquakes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How well does this architecture stand up to earthquakes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

